Rethinking Climate Change – Are We Being Deceived?
The truth and the 1000 testimonies
Throughout Earth's 4.5-billion-year history, the planet's climate has experienced substantial fluctuations. Undoubtedly, these shifts have occurred. Earth functions through its own inherent mechanisms, resulting in cyclical periods of cooling and warming over millennia. Nevertheless, WOKE narrative attributes climate change primarily to human influence. Is this narrative accurate? Let's explore this concept further.
Many of us are observing unconventional weather patterns across the globe and may be under the impression that Earth urgently requires intervention. While concerns about climate change are legitimate, it's vital to scrutinize the information we are presented with. Western sources have long propagated the notion that climate change is an irreversible process that will ultimately lead to catastrophic events such as floods, hurricanes, and other dramatic transformations. Yet, despite these dire predictions, such apocalyptic scenarios have yet to materialize. This narrative has been ongoing for decades and gained prominence through the efforts of former Vice President Al Gore, who has vested interests in this agenda and has accumulated substantial wealth through it. He currently leads The Climate Reality Project, a nonprofit ostensibly dedicated to addressing the climate crisis, though many argue that this crisis is greatly exaggerated. Millions of dollars are donated and expended, yet there is limited tangible change or improvement. Why? Because the problem may not exist as portrayed. Let me elucidate further. Al Gore and some of those who follow in his footsteps receive compensation for the statements they make. It's safe to assert that this compensation is quite substantial. When someone stands to benefit financially from making a particular claim, it's reasonable to assume that they will not only make those claims but also firmly support them. Therefore, it's crucial to always evaluate the source of information and any potential motivations they may have for promoting these ideas.
A new world climate declaration is saying that Climate change is fake! and it has been signed by 1609 Scientists all over the world. They argue that science has been hijacked by corporate and political entities to further their agenda.
Sources: https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/WCD-version-081423.pdf
In 2014, predictions suggested that we would witness severe consequences of global warming, including record-breaking temperatures. However, these forecasts did not come to fruition. So, what are the perceived perils of global warming, and why do many individuals remain concerned?
Global warming propogators say:
Cold weather may be underestimated, leading to a lack of caution.
Various species of animals, oceans, and plant life face potential threats. Well the truth is since the existence of human kind all animal, oceans and plant in general faced potential threats, long term or short term. That is not the argument we should be making to prove climate change is real.
Natural resources such as mountains may suffer adverse effects.
Population of coastal cities maybe under threat and so on.
If global warming were indeed occurring, we would anticipate observing reduced ice formation compared to previous years. Which is not the case. However, in 2014, numerous temperature records were surpassed, including an increase in ice levels in Antarctica. Furthermore, Lake Superior remained frozen for most of the year, with only three months experiencing ice-free conditions. These examples cast doubt on the notion of escalating global warming and its dire consequences.
Contrary to predictions of soaring temperatures, 2014 saw multiple records for cold temperatures being broken, including the infamous "Polar Vortex."
Despite claims of rising sea levels, the oceans have not surged as predicted in 2010 with current sea levels remaining relatively stable.
If global warming were an imminent crisis, the global scientific community would be in agreement and expressing more substantial concerns. However, this is not the case. Reports indicate that only about 1 percent of scientists perceive a problem with Earth's temperature, while the remaining 99 percent assert the opposite, suggesting that global warming may not pose the imminent threat it is portrayed to be.
So who’s pushing this agenda when most scientist are not on bored with global warming dangers and why is it that 1% has way more power than most scientist together.
I think the hardest part for most people is - understanding that while climate change is indeed happening, it's essential to recognize that this fluctuation has been a recurring pattern throughout Earth's 4.5-billion-year history. We observe this cycle of transitioning from cold to hot and vice versa repeatedly. Therefore, it's crucial to acknowledge that this process is inherently natural and human contribution to it is relatively minimal.
It is very important to track the money that is going into wildfires an similar disaster in the US and outside of it. In 2019, the European Anti-Fraud Office found that a European research consortium supposedly working on forest fire detection had syphoned off close to half a million euros in public funds. Most of the money went into a casino and hotel project in Cyprus – an island regularly hit by often deadly wildfires.
Here are the sources:
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-58073295
https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/media-corner/news/17-04-2020/olaf-investigation-uncovers-environmental-research-project-fraud_en. - when you click on the second source you will see that they took down the research and their article about the fraud research. Why would they do that? It is a good questions to ask. There is a big money into climate change agenda and it is time we woke up.
Important sources to read: Climate change reconsidered II.